5 ways Biden’s coronavirus response would differ from Trump’s

Joe Biden recently called President Trump about the coronavirus pandemic, supposedly offering some friendly advice. While it was obviously a political stunt, Trump could use an assist. He’s earning middling marks for his handling of the crisis, with 49% approving and 47% disapproving in late March, according to a Morning Consult survey. Those ratings are down from mid March, suggesting voters are souring on Trump’s daily scapegoating and his wishful thinking about reopening businesses any time soon.

Would Biden have done any better? That’s impossible to know, yet the question is likely to hang over the 2020 presidential campaign, since coronavirus now defines the entire Trump presidency. Democrats are already running ads highlighting Trump’s prolonged dismissal of the crisis, and Biden, the likely Democratic presidential nominee, is attacking Trump’s coronavirus response in regular TV appearances. So here are 5 ways Biden’s approach toward handling the crisis would differ from Trump’s:

Timeliness. Biden’s first major mention of the coronavirus came in a Jan. 27 USA Today op-ed in which he said the outbreak “will get worse before it gets better” and criticized Trump for “shortsighted policies that have left us unprepared for an epidemic.” He was certainly right about the crisis worsening. There were only 5 confirmed cases in the country at the time. The latest tally is approaching 400,000. Trump, by contrast, played down the problem well into March, saying on March 7, “I’m not concerned at all,” and on March 10, “Just stay calm. It will go away.” Faster action by the White House would have sped the production of badly needed tests, ventilators, masks and other equipment, while earlier guidance on social distancing and closing businesses could have limited the spread of the virus and the economic damage it’s causing.

Credit: David Foster/Yahoo Finance

Testing costs. Biden’s plan calls for free, widely available coronavirus tests for everybody who needs one, regardless of citizenship or immigration status, including at least 10 mobile or drive-through testing sites per state. That means Biden would need Congress to pass legislation covering the cost of the tests. The CARES Act Trump signed on March 27 requires insurance companies to cover the cost of testing, without co-pays. But it doesn’t prevent insurers from raising premiums in future years to cover the additional costs. And it doesn’t cover testing costs for the uninsured. Some public health advocates called on Trump to open a special enrollment period for insurance under the Affordable Care Act, so the uninsured would have a chance to buy coverage. Trump declined.