IceCure Announces Positive Data from the Largest Multi-Institutional Study of its Kind: "Cryoablation of Primary Breast Cancer in Patients Ineligible for Clinical Trials"

In This Article:

  • Investigator initiated independent study included higher risk patients such as those with metastatic disease, large tumors, and comorbidities, as compared to IceCure's ICE3 study which treated early-stage breast cancer patients

  • Recurrence-free rates were 94.7%, 87.8%, and 81.8%, at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively

  • Study published in American Journal of Roentgenology was conducted at 7 U.S. institutions and led by Principal Investigators Dr. Karim Oueidat and Dr. Robert Ward, both of the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University

CAESAREA, Israel, Aug. 7, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- IceCure Medical Ltd. (Nasdaq: ICCM) ("IceCure", "IceCure Medical" or the "Company"), developer of minimally-invasive cryoablation technology that destroys tumors by freezing as an alternative to surgical tumor removal, today announced the publication of an independent study titled "Cryoablation of Primary Breast Cancer in Patients Ineligible for Clinical Trials: A Multi-institutional Study" in a leading radiology journal, the American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR).

IceCure Medical Logo
IceCure Medical Logo

This multi-institutional study is the largest study of breast cancer cryoablation in women ineligible for prospective clinical trials due to particular patient or tumor characteristics. IceCure's ICE3 study, which evaluated the Company's ProSense? cryoablation system, enrolled early-stage breast cancer patients only. Based on the ICE3 results, IceCure has filed for regulatory approval of ProSense? in the U.S. for the indication of treating patients with early stage T1 invasive breast cancer with cryoablation and adjuvant hormone therapy.

As reported in the AJR, the independent study evaluated 112 patients with a median age of 71. ProSense? was one of four different cryoablation systems used for procedures performed at 7 U.S. institutions by 7 different radiologists, including 4 breast radiologists, 2 breast and interventional radiologists, and 1 interventional radiologist. The recurrence-free rates were 94.7%, 87.8%, and 81.8%, at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, when accounting for death, including from comorbidities, as a competing risk. Treatment with cryoablation had a low frequency of adverse events (AEs), with 6.3% of patients having minor AEs and no moderate or major AEs having occurred. A high frequency of procedures, 98.2%, were technically successful. The researchers concluded that in certain individuals with unfavorable patient or tumor characteristics, cryoablation remains a safe alternative to surgery that has overall good outcomes, especially in patients who are poor surgical candidates due to comorbidities. Patients in the independent study generally underwent cryoablation based on their preference for cryoablation.