Royce Investment Partners: The Prospects for Extended Small-Cap Outperformance

In This Article:

What factors do you think helped the Russell 2000 Index to do so well in 3Q24 on bothan absolute and relative basis?

Francis Gannon:

I think it was a quintessential reversion to the mean event. Small-caps have been lagging larger companies for such an extended period that we weren't surprised to see the significant rebound for the Russell 2000. The small-cap index was up 9.3% versus a 6.1% gain for the large-cap Russell 1000 and a 4.2% advance for the mega-cap Russell Top 50. The third quarterwas therefore a long-awaited reversal in performance that we think has legs.

Chuck Royce (Trades, Portfolio):

I think what surprised me most was how compressed the small-cap gains were. All of the third quarter's positive return had been achieved by the sixteenth of July. That was the high for the quartera 10.6% advance from the end of June, and there was a substantial gain on that mid-July day. So, we saw a wonderful run through the first couple of weeks of 3Q24 followed by a steep downdraft. From July 16th though August 7th, the Russell 2000 fell -10.1% before recovering most of its gains through the end of September. Nonetheless, we were pleased with how small-caps did for the quarter. After all, the Russell 2000 last beatthe Russell 1000 in the fourth quarter of 2023, so we were encouraged by the third quarter's results

Are you concerned about the volatility within small-cap in 3Q24?

CR:

I'm not concerned about that for a couple of reasons. The first is that we always welcome volatility. While it can be painful in the short run, we always work to use volatility in stock prices to our long-term advantage. And as Joe Hintz recently pointed out when talking about technology stocks, we try to benefit from the market's gyrations on both the upsideby trimming positions whose prices have run up in the short run while patiently waiting for a longer-term investment thesis to play outand on the downside when prices fall to levels that we find attractive. The second reason is that large intra-year declines are really common. Over the last 25 years, that is, since 2000, the Russell 2000 has had a double-digit intra-year pullback in 22 of them. So, as long-tenured small-cap specialists, we know that volatility is part of the admission price of investing in the asset class.

What underlies your thinking in terms of how small-cap can sustain its nascent market leadership?

FG:

One trend that we've been watching is large-cap market breadthbecause broadening large-cap markets have historically been a positive developments for small-cap leadership. Admittedly, this may sound a bit counterintuitive, at least initially. However, our research shows that when the equal-weighted Russell 1000 outperformed the capitalization-weighted Russell 1000, small-caps generally led. We think this is logical in that small-caps usually had market leadership when positive performance was more evenly distributed throughout the market. The equal-weighted Russell 1000 and S&P 500 both made new highs as September came to a close, and we see this expansion of returns as a positive sign for small-cap's relative performance prospects.