There's nothing wrong with Coca-Cola(NYSE: KO) as a company. In fact, it has a storied past and likely a bright future. But Wall Street is well aware of how attractive an investment Coca-Cola is, leaving it as what appears to be a fully priced stock today (and most of the time).
It does only one thing: make beverages (although it does this very well). So if you are looking at Coca-Cola, you might want to consider direct competitor PepsiCo(NASDAQ: PEP) or shift gears and look at Procter & Gamble(NYSE: PG). Here's why.
Start Your Mornings Smarter! Wake up with Breakfast news in your inbox every market day. Sign Up For Free ?
Coca-Cola is a one-trick pony
Coke's biggest strength is that it is a dominant beverage maker. It benefits from the distribution prowess, marketing skill, and innovation capabilities that come along with its size.
But this strength is also a weakness, since Coca-Cola's business is anything but diversified. Sure, you could argue that it makes different kinds of beverages, but beverages are the name of the game just the same.
At the end of the day, beverages are just one tiny niche of the broader consumer staples sector. Which is why you might want to take a look at PepsiCo, one of Coca-Cola's primary competitors in the beverage niche.
PepsiCo adds a dominant position in salty snacks (Frito-Lay) and a substantial packaged food business (Quaker Oats). This diversification can help to smooth financial performance over time. That may limit gains to some degree, but if there's a problem in the beverage business, it won't derail PepsiCo as it might Coca-Cola.
Meanwhile, Coke's price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) is roughly equal to its five-year average. PepsiCo's P/E is a bit more than 5% below its five-year average at this writing. And its 3.3% dividend yield is a touch higher than Coca-Cola's 3.1%. So PepsiCo looks a little cheaper, offers a little more yield, and has a much more diversified business. That should be attractive to more conservative investors.
Procter & Gamble plays a different game
There's another direction that investors can go, and that's to focus on the broader consumer staples sector. If you do that, then dominant companies like Procter & Gamble can be brought into consideration.
P&G makes consumable goods that people use every day and buy regularly. It has leading positions in products like toothpaste, laundry detergent, toilet paper, paper towels, deodorant, and diapers, to name just a few. If you are a fan of diversification, P&G offers you that in grand fashion, noting that it tends to play at the high end of the product categories in which it competes.
Like Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, P&G is a massive company with distribution, marketing, and innovation skills that would be hard to replicate. And it has a globally diversified portfolio.
To be fair, looking at the current P/E compared to the five-year average P/E, it is trading similarly to Coca-Cola from a valuation perspective. And the yield is only around 2.4%. So this may not be as appealing an alternative as PepsiCo in that regard.
However, Procter & Gamble's diversification across multiple product categories shouldn't be ignored. In fact, it might make a good pairing with Coca-Cola if you don't want to buy PepsiCo.
Buying a half position in Coca-Cola and a half position in P&G would actually lead to more diversification than if you bought PepsiCo only, given that P&G's products span a larger group of consumer staples categories. And you wouldn't be stepping down in quality in any way, given that P&G is one of the best-run consumer staples companies on the planet.
Coca-Cola is great, but consider your options
There's nothing wrong with Coca-Cola, and long-term investors will probably make out just fine if they buy it. But it isn't the only company to consider.
PepsiCo is another beverage giant to think about, and it adds in snacks and packaged foods, not to mention a slightly more attractive valuation and higher yield.
Or you could shift gears and look at a more diversified consumer staples giant like P&G, which could also be a solid compliment to Coca-Cola since there's little business overlap.
Don't simply buy Coca-Cola without thinking about other choices you have today. Some of the alternatives could end up being more attractive.
Don’t miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity
Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you’ll want to hear this.
On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a “Double Down” stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you’re worried you’ve already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it’s too late. And the numbers speak for themselves:
Amazon: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2010, you’d have $23,818!*
Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,221!*
Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $451,527!*
Right now, we’re issuing “Double Down” alerts for three incredible companies, and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.
Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Procter & Gamble. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.